<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Social Narratives on MuS</title><link>https://www.musnotes.my.id/en/categories/social-narratives/</link><description>Recent content in Social Narratives on MuS</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 01:00:00 +0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.musnotes.my.id/en/categories/social-narratives/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Identity and the Noise of Others' Perception</title><link>https://www.musnotes.my.id/en/digital-garden/silva-nigra/neural-gaps/notes-on-doubt/noiseidentitas/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 01:00:00 +0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.musnotes.my.id/en/digital-garden/silva-nigra/neural-gaps/notes-on-doubt/noiseidentitas/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To understand this, we can look at how identity is typically verified. In daily life, identity is often reduced to data: name, place of birth, status, or occupation. As if with just that data, a person can be fully &amp;ldquo;understood.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Something similar happens in biology. To recognize an organism, we need various indicators—from morphology and anatomy to physiology and even molecular data. It’s a complex process, and interestingly, taxonomy is often considered one of the &amp;ldquo;grayest&amp;rdquo; areas in biology.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Identity: The Living Organism Behind the Gray Matter</title><link>https://www.musnotes.my.id/en/digital-garden/silva-nigra/neural-gaps/notes-on-doubt/identitas/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 01:00:00 +0700</pubDate><guid>https://www.musnotes.my.id/en/digital-garden/silva-nigra/neural-gaps/notes-on-doubt/identitas/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This confusion isn&amp;rsquo;t exactly new. It’s been lingering for a long time, reminding me of the doubts I once wrote about in Certainty. Back then, I questioned the certainty of our perception of the world. This time, I’m questioning the certainty of who is actually doing the perceiving.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There was a time when I felt like the &amp;ldquo;weird&amp;rdquo; one among &amp;ldquo;normal&amp;rdquo; people (honestly, I still feel weird now). As a communications student back then, the &amp;ldquo;normal&amp;rdquo; thing to do was to practice persuasion techniques or try to look confident in front of an audience. But in reality, I actively avoided it. Instead of joining discussions about practical methods, I spent most of my time sitting alone in front of the psychology faculty, imagining that if I were a psychology student, I’d confidently mock Sigmund Freud’s &lt;a href="https://www.britannica.com/science/penis-envy"&gt;penis envy&lt;/a&gt; theory.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>